Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Problem-based learning and assessment in hydrology courses: Can non-traditional assessment better reflect intended learning outcomes?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1137-648X
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology. Stockholm Universitet, Sverige.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3344-2468
2011 (English)In: Natural Sciences Education, ISSN 2168-8281, Vol. 40, no 1, p. 199-205Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Hydrology has at its core a focus on real-world applications and problems stemming from the importance of water for society and natural systems. While hydrology is firmly founded in traditional “hard” sciences like physics and mathematics, much of the innovation and excitement in current and future research-oriented hydrology comes through intersection with other disciplines. This leads to combinations of intended learning outcomes (ILOs) in hydrology courses that may not be easily or completely achieved using traditional lecture-based learning environments or using basic problem-solving techniques. Problem based learning (PBL) may work well in hydrology courses due to the focus on real-world applications and cross-discipline natureof modern hydrology. Since PBL differs from traditional teacher-centered approaches, student learning must be supported and assessed differently. This article focuses on identifying several non-traditional assessment forms to help facilitate the use of PBL approaches in hydrology courses. We present an example hydrology modeling course employing one such non-traditional PBLspecific form of assessment. Further, we seek to test the hypothesis that  non-traditional assessment associated with PBL better reflects the ability of the students to achieve the ILOs in such courses. Results from the example course considered indicate that students not only preferred but also performed better in a PBL environment with its non-traditional form of assessment. This makes a strong case for incorporating both PBL and associated non-traditional forms of assessment into our teaching in hydrology and other applied science courses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 40, no 1, p. 199-205
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Physical Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-66397OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-66397DiVA, id: diva2:467736
Available from: 2011-12-19 Created: 2011-12-19 Last updated: 2022-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Abstract

Authority records

Lyon, Steve W.Teutschbein, Claudia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lyon, Steve W.Teutschbein, Claudia
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 51 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf