Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Calibration of hydrological models using flow-duration curves
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, ISSN 1027-5606, E-ISSN 1607-7938, Vol. 15, no 7, 2205-s were tested - based on equal intervals of discharge and of volume of = ter. The method was tested and compared to a calibration using the = aditional model efficiency for the daily four-parameter WAS-MOD model = the Paso La Ceiba catchment in Honduras and for Dynamic TOPMODEL = aluated at an hourly time scale for the Brue catchment in Great = itain. The volume method of selecting EPs gave the best results in = th catchments with better calibrated slow flow, recession and = aporation than the other criteria. Observed and simulated time series = uncertain discharges agreed better for this method both in = libration and prediction in both catchments. An advantage with the = thod is that the rejection criterion is based on an estimation of the = certainty in discharge data and that the EPs of the FDC can be chosen = reflect the aims of the modelling application, e. g. using more/less = p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The degree of belief we have in predictions from hydrologic models will normally depend on how well they can reproduce observations. Calibrations with traditional performance measures, such as the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency, are challenged by problems including: (1) uncertain discharge data, (2) variable sensitivity of different performance measures to different flow magnitudes, (3) influence of unknown input/output errors and (4) inability to evaluate model performance when observation time periods for discharge and model input data do not overlap. This paper explores a calibration method using flow-duration curves (FDCs) to address these problems. The method focuses on reproducing the observed discharge frequency distribution rather than the exact hydrograph. It consists of applying limits of acceptability for selected evaluation points (EPs) on the observed uncertain FDC in the extended GLUE approach. Two ways of selecting the EPs were tested - based on equal intervals of discharge and of volume of water. The method was tested and compared to a calibration using the traditional model efficiency for the daily four-parameter WAS-MOD model in the Paso La Ceiba catchment in Honduras and for Dynamic TOPMODEL evaluated at an hourly time scale for the Brue catchment in Great Britain. The volume method of selecting EPs gave the best results in both catchments with better calibrated slow flow, recession and evaporation than the other criteria. Observed and simulated time series of uncertain discharges agreed better for this method both in calibration and prediction in both catchments. An advantage with the method is that the rejection criterion is based on an estimation of the uncertainty in discharge data and that the EPs of the FDC can be chosen to reflect the aims of the modelling application, e. g. using more/less EPs at high/low flows. While the method appears less sensitive to epistemic input/output errors than previous use of limits of acceptability applied directly to the time series of discharge, it still requires a reasonable representation of the distribution of inputs. Additional constraints might therefore be required in catchments subject to snow and where peak-flow timing at sub-daily time scales is of high importance. The results suggest that the calibration method can be useful when observation time periods for discharge and model input data do not overlap. The method could also be suitable for calibration to regional FDCs while taking uncertainties in the hydrological model and data into account.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 15, no 7, 2205-s were tested - based on equal intervals of discharge and of volume of = ter. The method was tested and compared to a calibration using the = aditional model efficiency for the daily four-parameter WAS-MOD model = the Paso La Ceiba catchment in Honduras and for Dynamic TOPMODEL = aluated at an hourly time scale for the Brue catchment in Great = itain. The volume method of selecting EPs gave the best results in = th catchments with better calibrated slow flow, recession and = aporation than the other criteria. Observed and simulated time series = uncertain discharges agreed better for this method both in = libration and prediction in both catchments. An advantage with the = thod is that the rejection criterion is based on an estimation of the = certainty in discharge data and that the EPs of the FDC can be chosen = reflect the aims of the modelling application, e. g. using more/less = p.
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-66653DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-2205-2011ISI: 000293268200011OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-66653DiVA: diva2:468154
Note
authorCount :8Available from: 2011-12-20 Created: 2011-12-20 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Seibert, Jan
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology
In the same journal
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 43 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf