Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Aspects of lexical sophistication in advanced learners' oral production vocabulary acquisition and use in l2 french and italian
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Language Education.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of French, Italian and Classical Languages.
2012 (English)In: Studies in Second Language Acquisition, ISSN 0272-2631, E-ISSN 1470-1545, Vol. 34, no 2, 269-290 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article reports on the design and use of a profiler for lexical sophistication (i.e., use of advanced vocabulary), which was created to assess the lexical richness of intermediate and advanced Swedish second language (L2) learners' French and Italian. It discusses how teachers' judgments (TJs) of word difficulty can contribute to the methodology for lexical profiling and compares two methods, one purely frequency based and one modified on the basis of TJs of word difficulty. It has been suggested elsewhere that factors other than frequency play an important role in vocabulary acquisition. Here it is argued that cognates and thematic vocabulary related to teaching materials, although infrequent in target language (TL) corpora, should not necessarily be considered advanced and that analyses of learners' lexical sophistication would benefit from integrating these aspects. In this study, the frequency-based method normally used in lexical profiling was modified by recategorizing some low-frequency words considered easy by many teachers. On the basis of the TJs, a basic vocabulary, which consisted mainly of high-frequency words but also of cognates and thematic words, was defined, which was based on the fact that teachers judged certain low-frequency cognates and thematic words as relatively easy. Using the modified method, learners' lexical profiles were found to be more homogeneous within groups of learners at specific proficiency levels. The superiority of the new method over the purely frequency-based one was shown when comparing effect sizes. It is argued that this method gives a more correct picture of advanced L2 lexical profiles.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 34, no 2, 269-290 p.
Keyword [en]
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-79791DOI: 10.1017/S0272263112000058ISI: 000304015700005OAI: diva2:551586


Available from: 2012-09-11 Created: 2012-09-11 Last updated: 2015-04-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bardel, CamillaGudmundson, Anna
By organisation
Department of Language EducationDepartment of French, Italian and Classical Languages
In the same journal
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 167 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link