Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Should the probabilities count?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
2012 (English)In: Philosophical Studies, ISSN 0031-8116, E-ISSN 1573-0883, Vol. 159, no 2, 205-218 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

When facing a choice between saving one person and saving many, some people have argued that fairness requires us to decide without aggregating numbers; rather we should decide by coin toss or some form of lottery, or alternatively we should straightforwardly save the greater number but justify this in a non-aggregating contractualist way. This paper expands the debate beyond well-known number cases to previously under-considered probability cases, in which not (only) the numbers of people, but (also) the probabilities of success for saving people vary. It is shown that, in these latter cases, both the coin toss and the lottery lead to what is called an awkward conclusion, which makes probabilities count in a problematic way. Attempts to avoid this conclusion are shown to lead into difficulties as well. Finally, it is shown that while the greater number method cannot be justified on contractualist grounds for probability cases, it may be replaced by another decision method which is so justified. This decision method is extensionally equivalent to maximising expected value and seems to be the least problematic way of dealing with probability cases in a non-aggregating manner.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 159, no 2, 205-218 p.
Keyword [en]
Aggregation, Coin toss, Fairness, Lottery, Number cases, Probability cases
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-79916DOI: 10.1007/s11098-011-9698-1ISI: 000306683800003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-79916DiVA: diva2:551920
Note

AuthorCount:1;

Available from: 2012-12-20 Created: 2012-09-11 Last updated: 2017-11-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(258 kB)164 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 258 kBChecksum SHA-512
13a42681699f992a73d9a73c1259ab659efac5602332f747c02350fab769890fcf7aaafeac14f86db33f7906e1613081c2a00e687118302db5d8948e66456703
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berndt Rasmussen, Katharina
By organisation
Department of Philosophy
In the same journal
Philosophical Studies
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 164 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 928 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf