Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Razones de un distanciamiento político: El Movimiento Indígena ecuatoriano y la Revolución Ciudadana
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Spanish, Portuguese and Latin American Studies, Institute of Latin American Studies.
Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Quito..
2012 (Spanish)In: Revista OSAL, ISSN 1515-3282, no 32Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [es]

A pesar de compartir inicialmente las mismas posturas políticas, las relaciones entre el movimiento indígena ecuatoriano – principalmente representado por la CONAIE – y el gobierno progresista de Rafael Correa y el Movimiento PAÍS se han caracterizado por conflictos y distanciamientos. Entender esta paradoja es el tema de este artículo. El objetivo del estudio es explorar analíticamente las razones que se encuentran detrás de estas relaciones conflictivas desde el inicio del gobierno Correa a inicios de 2007. Cuatro temáticas interconectadas se enfatizan como explicaciones de los desacuerdos y distancias entre ambos actores políticos. Estas diferencias programáticas son la oposición a la explotación minera, las actitudes hacia la movilización social, la política agraria y, finalmente, la política estatal que llamamos “desectorización”.

Abstract [en]

Despite sharing common initial political concerns, the relationship between the Ecuadorian Indigenous movement –mainly represented by the CONAIE confederation- and the Leftist government of Rafael Correa and his PAIS movement has been characterized by conflicts and disagreements. This is the central contradiction behind this article. The objective of the study is to analytically explore particular reasons behind this conflictive relationship since the establishment of the Correa government from 2007 onwards. Four interconnected thematic fields are emphasized as likely explanations to the disagreement and distance between the indigenous organizations and the government. These programmatic differences are: opposition against resource exploitation, attitudes towards social mobilization, agrarian politics, and lastly, the state policy we label de-sectorization.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Buenos Aires: CLACSO , 2012. no 32
Keyword [en]
Indigenous movement, progressive governments, Ecuador.
Keyword [es]
Movimiento Indígena, gobiernos progresistas, Ecuador.
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Social Anthropology; Sociology; Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-80695OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-80695DiVA: diva2:557077
Available from: 2012-09-27 Created: 2012-09-27

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://www.clacso.org.ar/institucional/1h3_libro_detalle.php?idioma=&id_libro=717&pageNum_rs_libros=http://www.clacso.org.ar/institucional/1h3.php?idioma=&pageNum_rs_libros=

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lalander, Rickard
By organisation
Institute of Latin American Studies
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 310 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf