Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Argumentation and Critique in Science Citizenship Education and Scientific Literacy: Symposium on Literacy and Didactics: Perspectives, Practices and Consequences I
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Science Education. (Naturvetenskapsämnenas didaktik)
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Science Education. (Naturvetenskapsämnenas didaktik)
2012 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

How citizenship education should be designed and what it should aim for is debated. The Swedish national curriculum describes the democratic mission for the compulsory school as imparting respect for human rights, fundamental democratic values and preparing students to responsibly participate in societal life. This mission is to be implemented in all school subjects. Here, we aim to shed light on how these ideas are expressed in the curriculum documents for science education in compulsory school in terms of argumentation and critique. We perform an analysis of the national syllabuses and commentary materials and also discuss the results from educational philosophy perspectives. First, we scrutinize the idea of developing students’ abilities to engage in argumentation, argumentation as means to reach consensus and argumentation as dissensus and agonism from a radical democratic perspective. Second, we scrutinize the idea of critique as expressed in the documents in relation to what has been described as a neo-liberal discourse of independence and integrity. We summarize our findings in what we suggest to be a tension between consensus and agonism. We point to affordances and constraints in the curriculum documents concerning possibilities of bringing together argumentation and critique in what we call critical deliberative education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cadiz: EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION , 2012.
National Category
Didactics Pedagogy
Research subject
Science Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-82028OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-82028DiVA: diva2:565131
Conference
ECER 2012, The Need for Educational Research to Champion Freedom, Education and Development for All
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Note

Ingår i nätverket för Literacy Practices finansierat av Vetenskapsrådet.

Available from: 2012-11-06 Created: 2012-11-06 Last updated: 2013-09-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Conference webpage

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andrée, MariaLundegård, Iann
By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Science Education
DidacticsPedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 92 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf