Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rules of the seed size game: contests between large-seeded and small-seeded species
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany.
2013 (English)In: Oikos, ISSN 0030-1299, E-ISSN 1600-0706, Vol. 122, no 7, 1080-1084 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The coexistence of multiple seed size strategies within plant communities have been considered puzzling, based on a theoretical expectation of the existence of an optimal seed size under each set of specific environmental conditions. A model aimed at explaining the coexistence of different seed sizes has been suggested, where a seed size – seed number trade-off is connected to a trade-off between competition and colonization, leading to a competitive advantage in larger-seeded species and a colonization advantage in smaller-seeded species. Recently an alternative model has been suggested, based on a trade-off between stress tolerance and fecundity, associated with the variation from large to small seeds. Here, we examine the role of seed size for recruitment in two-species contests subjected to various treatments. In a garden experiment seeds of 14 plant species were combined pair-wise into seven pairs, each with one larger-seeded species and one smaller-seeded species. Each species-pair was sown with sparse and dense seed densities and subjected to different treatments of shading and litter. Recruitment was recorded during two years. Our results showed a general advantage of larger-seeded species over smaller-seeded species. This seed size advantage increased in treatments with litter, whereas there were minor effects of shade, and no effect of seed density was found. We thus found little support for a density dependent seed size game as assumed in models of a competition-colonization trade-off, whereas our results fit well with a model based on a trade-off between stress tolerance and fecundity. Our experiment provides novel empirical data to theoretical models on co-existence between multiple seed size strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 122, no 7, 1080-1084 p.
National Category
Ecology Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Plant Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-82376DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.00249.xISI: 000320618900014OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-82376DiVA: diva2:567483
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2012-11-13 Created: 2012-11-13 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Effects of seed size and habitat on recruitment patterns in grassland and forest plants
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Effects of seed size and habitat on recruitment patterns in grassland and forest plants
2012 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

A trade-off between seed size and seed number is central in seed ecology, and has been suggested to be related to a trade-off between competition and colonization, as well as to a trade-off between stress tolerance and fecundity. Large seeds endure hazards during establishment, such as shading, drought, litter coverage and competition from other plants, better than do small seeds, due to a larger amount of stored resources in the seed. Small seeds, however, are numerous and small-seeded species are therefore more fecund. Moreover, a pattern with small-seeded species being associated with open habitats and large-seeded species being associated with closed habitats has been reported in the literature. In this thesis I assess effects of seed size on recruitment, and how relationships between seed size and recruitment may relate to habitat conditions. Seed sowing experiments were performed in the field to assess inter- and intra-specific relationships between seed size and recruitment in open and closed habitats (Paper I and II). Seed removal experiments were performed in the field to assess what effects seed predation may have on a relationship between seed size and recruitment (Paper III). A garden experiment was performed based on contests between larger-seeded and smaller-seeded species, in order to examine different models on co-existence of multiple seed size strategies. The results showed that there was a weak positive relationship between seed size and recruitment in the field, and that this relationship was only weakly and inconclusively related to habitat (Paper I and II). Seed removal was negatively related to seed size in closed habitats and unrelated to seed size in open habitats (Paper III). This indicates that any positive relationship between seed size and recruitment may be an effect of higher seed removal in small-seeded species. However, when grown under controlled conditions in a garden experiment, there was a clear advantage of larger-seeded species over smaller-seeded species (Paper IV). This advantage was unaffected by seed density, indicating that there was no competitive advantage of the larger-seeded species. Instead, indirect evidence suggests that larger-seeded species exhibit higher tolerance to stress.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Botany, Stockholm University, 2012. 32 p.
Keyword
Seed size, seedling establishment, seedling survival, recruitment, seed removal, co-existence, game-theory
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Plant Ecology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-82384 (URN)978-91-7447-599-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2012-12-14, Föreläsningssalen, Botaniska institutionen, Lilla Frescativägen 5, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 3: Manuscript. Paper 4: Accepted.

 

Available from: 2012-11-22 Created: 2012-11-13 Last updated: 2012-11-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lönnberg, KarinEriksson, Ove
By organisation
Department of Botany
In the same journal
Oikos
EcologyEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 93 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf