Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Psychosocial work stressors and salivary cortisol
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: The role of saliva cortisol measurement in health and disease / [ed] Margareta Kristenson, Peter Garvin, Ulf Lundberg, Sharjah: Bentham Science , 2012, 1, 43-66 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This chapter systematically reviews how different measures of salivary cortisol are related to different measures of psychosocial work stress. Divergent findings were scrutinized with respect to study quality and the methods used. Measures of work stress included concepts reflecting those included in the demand–control–support model or the effort–reward–imbalance model. General bibliographic databases (PsychINFO and PubMed) were searched up to September 30, 2009. Two reviewers extracted data on study characteristics and study quality. In total 27 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Cortisol measures were grouped into single time points at different times during the day, deviations at different time periods during the day, reactivity and recovery after a standardized laboratory test, area under the curve from deviations and reactivity measures. A large proportion of the analyses of the associations between cortisol and psychosocial work stressors showed nonsignificant findings. However, of the significant findings, most results showed that a high work stress was associated with high cortisol levels. Significant relationships were evenly distributed across different measures of psychosocial work stress. As regards salivary sampling or statistical analysis, no strategy seemed superior but some strategies have only been used in the past few years. Typically, older studies were of lower quality. Low quality studies tended to have a higher proportion of significant findings which is a reason for concern. The relatively few significant findings may be because many psychosocial work stressors were of mild or moderate intensity and the study groups were rather small and fairly homogeneous, thus variability was too small to reveal any effects. The results indicate a normal, healthy response to work stress in most workers, according to CATS and the Allostatic Load Models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sharjah: Bentham Science , 2012, 1. 43-66 p.
Keyword [en]
work stress, cortisol, health
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-83219DOI: 10.2174/978160805342111201010043ISBN: 978-1-60805-342-1OAI: diva2:574543
Available from: 2012-12-05 Created: 2012-12-05 Last updated: 2013-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindfors, PetraRiva, RobertoMellner, ChristinTheorell, TöresLundberg, Ulf
By organisation
Department of PsychologyStress Research Institute

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 95 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link