Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Knowing the Arctic: The Arctic Council as a cognitive forerunner
Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm Environment Institute.
2012 (English)In: The Arctic Council: Its place in the future of Arctic governance / [ed] T.S. Axworthy et al., Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program , 2012, Ch. 7- p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

A core task of the Arctic Council has been to conduct scientific assessments of the state of the Arctic. Several reports, including the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, have brought attention to the Arctic from far beyond the region. Some assessments have also had substantial impact on policy development. The focus on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) is one case. These examples reveal that the Arctic Council is a cognitive forerunner and assessments a tool for “soft” power. Given the political challenges in reaching legally binding political agreements, it is likely that assessments and other activities related to cognitive power will continue to be important for the Arctic Council. This chapter analyzes circumstances that have facilitated or hindered successes in the past. It focuses on two issues that pose significant challenges for Arctic people: POPs and climate change. Based on the analysis, it discusses the organization of the Arctic Council working groups, concluding that the current organizational structure is not adequate for the challenges that are facing the Arctic today. To continue to be a cognitive forerunner, the Arctic Council has to increase its ability to assess the interactions of different drivers of change, including social changes connected with pressures from globalization. It will also need to address politically contentious issues, which creates new challenges regarding the delicate boundary between science and policy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program , 2012. Ch. 7- p.
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Applied Environmental Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-83741ISBN: 9780973765151 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-83741DiVA: diva2:576754
Available from: 2012-12-13 Created: 2012-12-13 Last updated: 2013-01-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://gordonfoundation.ca/publication/530

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, Annika E.
By organisation
Stockholm Environment Institute
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 245 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf