Reply to Forbes
2012 (English)In: Analysis, ISSN 0003-2638, E-ISSN 1467-8284, Vol. 72, no 2, 298-303 p.Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
In earlier work (Glüer, K. and P. Pagin. 2006. Proper names and relational modality. Linguistics & Philosophy 29: 507–35; Glüer, K. and P. Pagin. 2008. Relational modality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17: 307–22), we developed a semantics for (metaphysical) modal operators that accommodates Kripkean intuitions about proper names in modal contexts even if names are not rigid designators. Graeme Forbes (2011. The problem of factives for sense theories. Analysis 71: 654–62.) criticizes our proposal. He argues that our semantics predicts readings for certain natural language sentences which these simply do not have. These sentences contain mixed contexts involving factive attitude verbs. We argue that the readings our semantics predicts do indeed exist, even if it might take a little work to bring them out. Moreover, denying their existence would have some rather unattractive consequences.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 72, no 2, 298-303 p.
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-84347DOI: 10.1093/analys/ans033OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-84347DiVA: diva2:579929