Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Reply to Forbes
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
2012 (English)In: Analysis, ISSN 0003-2638, E-ISSN 1467-8284, Vol. 72, no 2, 298-303 p.Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In earlier work (Glüer, K. and P. Pagin. 2006. Proper names and relational modality. Linguistics & Philosophy 29: 507–35; Glüer, K. and P. Pagin. 2008. Relational modality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17: 307–22), we developed a semantics for (metaphysical) modal operators that accommodates Kripkean intuitions about proper names in modal contexts even if names are not rigid designators. Graeme Forbes (2011. The problem of factives for sense theories. Analysis 71: 654–62.) criticizes our proposal. He argues that our semantics predicts readings for certain natural language sentences which these simply do not have. These sentences contain mixed contexts involving factive attitude verbs. We argue that the readings our semantics predicts do indeed exist, even if it might take a little work to bring them out. Moreover, denying their existence would have some rather unattractive consequences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 72, no 2, 298-303 p.
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-84347DOI: 10.1093/analys/ans033OAI: diva2:579929
Available from: 2012-12-20 Created: 2012-12-20 Last updated: 2016-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glüer-Pagin, KathrinPagin, Peter
By organisation
Department of Philosophy
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 71 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link