Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Destructive myths about NGL – how do we cope with them?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences. Högskolan i Dalarna.
2012 (English)In: Next Generation Learning Conference, NGL 2012: Conference Proceedings, 2012, 21-62 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In this paper I will use the term NGL – Next Generation Learning – as more or less synonymous with terms like eLearning, distance learning, flexible learning. I will focus on learning with a large percentage of internetbased knowledge resources and communication and collaboration between teachers and students. The analysis is based on my own experiences from three Swedish universities, Mid Sweden University, Stockholm University, and Dalarna University, and on some international studies. I am personally convinced that NGL has a great potential for improving many aspects of the quality and efficiency of learning, but I am also aware of a very strong lobby of people in government and educational institutions who are convinced that NGL is a serious threat against quality: increased resources should instead be given to more conventional learning with focus on the teacher in the classroom. In my opinion, the scepticism against NGL is to a large extent based on myths which are not based upon facts. On the other hand, I think we must also admit that many arguments in favour of NGL are not yet supported by a sufficient amount of facts. This paper will analyse some of the arguments for and against NGL, and how we could possibly obtain facts which provide more solid support of the alleged advantages of NGL and which at the same time help to falsify destructive myths about NGL.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. 21-62 p.
National Category
Information Systems
Research subject
Computer and Systems Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-84860ISBN: 978-91-85941-47-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-84860DiVA: diva2:581618
Conference
NGL 2012, February 21–23, 2012, Falun, Sweden
Available from: 2013-01-02 Created: 2013-01-02 Last updated: 2013-05-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://www.du.se/Global/dokument/NGL/NGL%202012/Conference%20proceedings.pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundgren, Bo
By organisation
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences
Information Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf