Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Student Engagement with Artefacts and Scientific Ideas in a Laboratory and a Concept-Mapping Activity
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Science Education. (NV)
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Science Education. (NV)
2013 (English)In: International Journal of Science Education, ISSN 0950-0693, E-ISSN 1464-5289, Vol. 35, no 13, 2254-2277 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study is to use a comparative approach to scrutinize the common assumption that certain school science activities are theoretical and therefore particularly suited for engaging students with scientific ideas, whereas others are practical and, thus, not equally conducive to engagement with scientific ideas. We compared two school science activities, one (laboratory work) that is commonly regarded as focusing attention on artefacts that may distract students from central science concepts and the other (concept mapping) that is thought to make students focus directly on these concepts. We observed students in either a laboratory activity about real galvanic cells or a concept-mapping activity about idealized galvanic cells. We used a practical epistemology analysis to compare the two activities regarding students' actions towards scientific ideas and artefacts. The comparison revealed that the two activities, despite their alleged differences along the theory–practice scale, primarily resulted in similar student actions. For instance, in both activities, students interacted extensively with artefacts and, to a lesser extent, with scientific ideas. However, only occasionally did students establish any explicit continuity between artefacts and scientific ideas. The findings indicate that some of the problems commonly considered to be unique for school science practical work may indeed be a feature of school science activities more generally.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 35, no 13, 2254-2277 p.
Keyword [en]
Chemistry education, Laboratory work, Discourse, Concept mapping, High school, Learning
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Science Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-85920DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.743696ISI: 000322864600006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-85920DiVA: diva2:585499
Projects
How can teachers aid students towards scientific reasoning?
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2004-1444
Available from: 2013-01-10 Created: 2013-01-10 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hamza, Karim MikaelWickman, Per-Olof
By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Science Education
In the same journal
International Journal of Science Education
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 63 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf