Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A decline in the prevalence of injecting drug users in Estonia, 2005–2009
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3127-5077
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: International Journal of Drug Policy, ISSN 0955-3959, Vol. 24, no 4, p. 312-318Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims: Here we report a study aimed at estimating trends in the prevalence of injection drug use between 2005 and 2009 in Estonia. Background: Descriptions of behavioural epidemics have received little attention compared with infectious disease epidemics in Eastern Europe. Methods: The number of injection drug users (IDUs) aged 15–44 each year between 2005 and 2009 was estimated using capture–recapture methodology based on 4 data sources (2 treatment data bases: drug use and non-fatal overdose treatment; criminal justice (drug related offences) and mortality (injection drug use related deaths) data). Poisson log-linear regression models were applied to the matched data, with interactions between data sources fitted to replicate the dependencies between the data sources. Linear regression was used to estimate average change over time. Results: There were 24305, 12,292, 238, 545 records and 8100, 1655, 155, 545 individual IDUs identified in the four capture sources (police, drug treatment, overdose, and death registry, accordingly) over the period 2005–2009. The estimated prevalence of IDUs among the population aged 15–44 declined from 2.7% (1.8–7.9%) in 2005 to 2.0% (1.4–5.0%) in 2008, and 0.9% (0.7–1.7%) in 2009. Regression analysis indicated an average reduction of about 1600 injectors per year. Conclusion: While the capture–recapture method has known limitations, the results are consistent with other data from Estonia. Identifying the drivers of change in the prevalence of injection drug use warrants further research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 24, no 4, p. 312-318
National Category
Substance Abuse
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-86165DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.11.002ISI: 000322858400010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-86165DiVA, id: diva2:586289
Available from: 2013-01-11 Created: 2013-01-11 Last updated: 2022-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Rajaleid, Kristiina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rajaleid, Kristiina
By organisation
Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS)
Substance Abuse

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 78 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf