Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Conflicting Reasons in the Small-Improvement Argument
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, & Swedish Defence Research Agency.
2010 (English)In: The Philosophical Quarterly, ISSN 0031-8094, E-ISSN 1467-9213, Vol. 60, no 214, p. 754-763Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 60, no 214, p. 754-763
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-86593DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.648.xOAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-86593DiVA, id: diva2:587494
Available from: 2013-01-14 Created: 2013-01-14 Last updated: 2022-05-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Espinoza, Nicolas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Espinoza, Nicolas
In the same journal
The Philosophical Quarterly
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 42 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf