Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Defining Elements of Advocacy Coalitions: Continuing the Search for Explanations for Coordination and Coalition Structures
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
2013 (English)In: Review of Policy Research, ISSN 1541-132X, E-ISSN 1541-1338, Vol. 30, no 2, 240-257 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

As the theoretical and practical interest in policy networks increases, so does the need for further research into how, and based on what rationales, actors within a policy subsystem engage in interorganizational collective action and form political coalitions. The aim of this paper is to continue the search for explanations for coordination and coalition structures in the setting of Swedish carnivore policy. Based on the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) and a previous case study within the same policy subsystem, the study investigates a set of hypotheses regarding actors' coordinating behavior and the defining elements of coalitions. The empirical analysis indicates, in support of the ACF, that perceived belief correspondence is a better predictor of coordination than perceived influence. Moreover, the explanatory power of empirical policy core beliefs in general, and normative policy core beliefs in particular, is further reinforced, while deep core beliefs seemingly do not influence coalition structure. The relevance of more shallow beliefs for coalition formation cannot be dismissed and therefore calls for additional research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 30, no 2, 240-257 p.
Keyword [en]
advocacy coalition framework, beliefs, carnivore management, collaborative management, governance, natural resource management, policy analysis, policy networks, social networks, social network analysis
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-88986DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12011ISI: 000315826700005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-88986DiVA: diva2:615452
Note

AuthorCount:2;

Available from: 2013-04-10 Created: 2013-04-08 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Annica
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Review of Policy Research
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf