Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Recent fertility patterns of Finnish women by union status: A descriptive account
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
2013 (English)In: Demographic Research, ISSN 1435-9871, Vol. 28, 409-419 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Remarkably little is known about the significance of consensual unions for fertility. This is true everywhere, but the lacuna is more important in the Nordic countries where there is so much childbearing outside of marriage, mostly in consensual unions. The purpose of this paper is to help fill this hole in our knowledge for Finland. DATA Unusually good register data enable us to study recent fertility trends by union status (married, cohabiting, neither) using records for some 112,000 Finnish women, or 11% of all women at fertile ages. METHODS Our description of fertility is based on group-specific duration-based TFRs, which is the number of children borne by a woman who remains in the group throughout her reproductive life, as computed from the fertility rates for a synthetic cohort. This is an intuitively appealing metric that has been taken into systematic use only recently. RESULTS We find substantial fertility differences between women who cohabit, women who marry directly (i.e., without pre-marital cohabitation), and women who marry their cohabitational partner. As one would also expect in Finland, cohabiting women have much lower fertility than married women. The marital TFR is highest among the directly-married and declines monotonically as the length of pre-marital cohabitation increases, even when premarital childbearing is included in the count. As far as we know the latter relationship has not been shown before, because extensive data for complete cohabitational unions have not been available for other populations. CONCLUSIONS The Finnish data are unique, even among the Nordic countries, in that they contain individual-level life histories of family dynamics that cover consensual unions from their very start. Fertility analysis would benefit if data similar to the Finnish were to become available, because analyses that rely on civil status as an indicator of union status barely add anything to what we already know about today's family dynamics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 28, 409-419 p.
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-88975ISI: 000315466100001OAI: diva2:615866


Available from: 2013-04-12 Created: 2013-04-08 Last updated: 2013-04-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hoem, Jan M.
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Demographic Research

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 26 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link