Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The available evidence suggests the percent measure should not be used to study inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution.
2013 (English)In: Judgment and decision making, ISSN 1930-2975, Vol. 8, no 3, 395-396 p.Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

In this reply, we reiterate the main point of our 2012 paper, which was that the measure of inequality used by Norton and Ariely (2011) was too difficult for it to yield meaningful results. We describe additional evidence for this conclusion, and we also challenge the conclusion that political differences in perceived and desired inequality are small.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 8, no 3, 395-396 p.
Keyword [en]
perceived inequality, measurement of judgment
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-91940ISI: 000319657500016OAI: diva2:636586


Available from: 2013-07-10 Created: 2013-07-09 Last updated: 2013-07-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution
In the same journal
Judgment and decision making

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 17 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link