Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The hypothesis of ether and Reid's interpretation of Newton's first rule of philosophizing
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
1999 (English)In: Synthese, ISSN 0039-7857, E-ISSN 1573-0964, Vol. 120, no 1, 19-26 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

My object is to question a recurrent claim made to the point that Thomas Reid (1710–1796) was hostile to ether theories and that this hostility had its source in his distinctive interpretation of the first of Newton’s regulæ philosophandi. Against this view I argue that Reid did not have any quarrel at all with unobservable or theoretical entities as such, and that his objections against actual theories concerning ether were scientific rather than philosophical, even when based on Newton’s first rule. I argue further that Reid’s insistence on Newton’s rule concerns, not direct observation, but rather the notion of explanation itself.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1999. Vol. 120, no 1, 19-26 p.
Keyword [en]
Reid, Newton, Ether, theoretical entities
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-94141OAI: diva2:651907
Available from: 2013-09-27 Created: 2013-09-27 Last updated: 2013-10-17

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Philosophy
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 11 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link