Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Before policy: creating authoritative knowledge for policy
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0184-6836
2011 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this session is to shed light on the basis of policy, to zoom in on how, by whom, where and why the stuff that policy is shaped upon is created. Policy-making is processual and all papers in the session focus on various aspects of the earliest stages of policy-making, looking into how the authoritative knowledge upon which policies then are crafted emerges.

Such knowledge is typically constructed around numbers, which may thus be seen as “objects with agency” (Muniesa, Millo and Callon 2007). In what has been termed “a regime of calculation” (Porter 1995) and “a culture of numbers” (Knorr Cetina 1999), the seemingly objective and neutral character of numbers and statistics has been unveiled (see Miller 2001; Porter 1995; Rose 1999).

Numbers and statistics are, from such a critical perspective, seen as political instruments and “bearers of implicit meaning” and as a way for power to operate in disguise by means of “governing by numbers” (Miller 2001; Nyqvist 2008; Thedvall 2006). Within such a line of reasoning it has been suggested that numbers act in four ways, namely, to establish expertise and authority, to make knowledge impersonal, to portray certainty and universality and to contribute to resolving situations of doubt, conflict and mistrust (Zaloom 2006).

The study of the basis of policy allows for critical analysis of issues of power and the construction of regimes of truth. How does authoritative knowledge emerge? How are calculations and idioms developed to make new way of thinking hegemonic? All papers in this panel focus on and shed light on the knowledge that policies are shaped and constructed upon. The session opens up with a general introduction to the field stating the importance of studying the embryonic and formative stage of policy-making. The five invited papers deal, in various ways, with the creation of knowledge upon which policies within such different political areas such as environmental issues, immigration politics and financial policy is created and how. The session concludes with a presentation held by an invited discussant. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011.
Keywords [en]
anthropology of policy, knowledge production
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Research subject
Social Anthropology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-94654OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-94654DiVA, id: diva2:654758
Conference
American Anthropological Association conference 16-20 November in Montreal, Canada
Available from: 2013-10-08 Created: 2013-10-08 Last updated: 2022-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Nyqvist, Anette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nyqvist, Anette
By organisation
Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE)Department of Social Anthropology
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 82 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf