Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Subjective Cognitive Complaints in the Working Population - The Role of Executive Cognitive Functioning
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stress Research Institute.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stress Research Institute.
Show others and affiliations
(English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203Article in journal (Refereed) Accepted
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-95792OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-95792DiVA: diva2:661581
Available from: 2013-11-04 Created: 2013-11-04 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Subjective Cognitive Complaints in the Working Population: The Influence of Objective Cognitive Functioning and Working Conditions
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Subjective Cognitive Complaints in the Working Population: The Influence of Objective Cognitive Functioning and Working Conditions
2013 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Cognitive functioning is important for managing work and life in general. However, subjective cognitive complaints (SCC), involving self-perceived difficulties with concentration, memory, decision making, and clear thinking are common in the general and in the working population and can be coupled with both lowered well-being and work ability. The present thesis investigated the extent to which SCC among people in the work force can be explained by objective cognitive functioning (study I & II) and working conditions (study III), utilizing samples from the working population. The potential roles of other common psychological problems which often co-occur with SCC were also investigated in studies I-III.

In Study I, high levels of SCC were associated with significantly poorer episodic memory performance during high executive demands and a trend was found towards poorer episodic memory, while not being associated with semantic memory. In Study II, high levels of SCC were associated with significantly poorer executive cognitive performance on all three executive cognitive tests used. Symptoms of depression, chronic stress and sleeping problems were found to play an important role in the relations between SCC and episodic memory during divided attention in study I and executive cognitive functioning in study II. In Study III, in all cross-sectional data analyses, high quantitative demands, information and communication technology (ICT) demands, underqualification in the work situation and inter-personal conflicts were positively associated with SCC, whereas social support, good resources at work and overqualification in the work situation were negatively associated with SCC. In all prospective data analyses, quantitative job demands, ICT demands and underqualification were positively associated with future SCC, including when adjusted for baseline cognitive complaints.

The findings may guide prevention of and interventions for SCC among people in the work force.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 2013. 92 p.
Keyword
Subjective cognitive complaints, cognitive functioning, declarative memory, episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, executive cognitive functioning, psychosocial working conditions, demand-control-support model, population-based
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-95797 (URN)978-91-7447-809-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2013-12-13, David Magnussonsalen (U31), Frescati Hagväg 8, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 1: Submitted. Paper 2: Accepted.

Available from: 2013-11-21 Created: 2013-11-04 Last updated: 2013-12-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenfors, Cecilia U.D.Marklund, PetterMagnusson Hanson, Linda L.Theorell, TöresNilsson, Lars-Göran
By organisation
Department of PsychologyStress Research Institute
In the same journal
PLoS ONE
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf