Moral Distress and its Interconnection with Moral Sensitivity and Moral Resilience: Viewed from the Philosophy of Viktor E. Frankl
2013 (English)In: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, ISSN 1176-7259, Vol. 10, no 3, 317-324 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
The interconnection between moral distress, moral sensitivity, and moral resilience was explored by constructing two hypothetical scenarios based on a recent Swedish newspaper report. In the first scenario, a 77-year-old man, rational and awake, was coded as “do not resuscitate” (DNR) against his daughter’s wishes. The patient died in the presence of nurses who were not permitted to resuscitate him. The second scenario concerned a 41-year-old man, who had been in a coma for three weeks. He was also coded as “do not resuscitate” and, when he stopped breathing, was resuscitated by his father. The nurses persuaded the physician on call to resume life support treatment and the patient recovered. These scenarios were analyzed using Viktor Frankl’s existential philosophy, resulting in a conceivable theoretical connection between moral distress, moral sensitivity, and moral resilience. To substantiate our conclusion, we encourage further empirical research.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Netherlands, 2013. Vol. 10, no 3, 317-324 p.
existential analysis, meaning, moral distress, moral sensitivity, moral resilience
Research subject Psychology
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-97170DOI: 10.1007/s11673-013-9469-0ISI: 000325961700008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-97170DiVA: diva2:676175