Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reported Speech and Reported Affect in Child Custody Disputes
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Child and Youth Studies.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Child and Youth Studies.
2014 (English)In: Research on Language and Social Interaction, ISSN 0835-1813, E-ISSN 1532-7973, Vol. 47, no 1, 69-88 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study analyses mothers' versus fathers' versions of events in three cases of audio-recorded child custody disputes in Sweden. We show how the parents use direct reported speech (including self-quotes) and reports of feelings as discursive devices for creating alternative versions with epistemic authority and credibility. Data in Swedish and English translation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 47, no 1, 69-88 p.
National Category
Sociology
Research subject
Child and Youth Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-97536DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2014.871806ISI: 000337177900006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-97536DiVA: diva2:679030
Projects
Vittnesmål i vårdnadstvister - förhandlingar om barnets bästa i domstol och familjerätt
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2010-0335
Available from: 2013-12-13 Created: 2013-12-12 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Dilemmas in child custody disputes: the child's best interest in courtroom discourse
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dilemmas in child custody disputes: the child's best interest in courtroom discourse
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis examines courtroom interactions involving child custody disputes, exploring how participants during courtroom hearings orient to and manage the task of presenting their own side, while contesting the opposing party, in matters like the child’s best interest, domestic violence, parental neglect and misconduct. Drawing on 42 audio-recorded courtroom examinations of litigating parents by the same side and opponent side attorneys, it examines authentic courtroom hearings. Theoretically and methodologically, the thesis primarily builds on discursive psychology and conversation analysis. It draws on and contributes to studies on institutional talk by explicating the subtle interactional work required by participants in this institutional setting.

The overall aim is to examine how interactional dilemmas in child custody disputes, requiring participants to simultanously manage contradictory activities, are handled through discursive practices. A core dilemma concerns the child’s (lack of) participation in the proceeding. In this absence, litigants try to mobilize the child’s voice and experiences in order to support their own claims, in danger of having such attempts dismissed as mere reflections of their own interest. The child’s reported speech and reported affects are important discursive devices for handling this dilemma. Another dilemma arises when litigants blame each other. Although this is necessary to ‘win’, litigants are regularly blamed when doing so, which generates something of a blame machinery of never-ending blame. A final dilemma concerns domestic violence. While implicitly gendered social categorizations are invoked to support mothers' claims of fearing their ex-partners, such discursive work is undermined through contrasting social categorizations.

By analyzing child custody disputes on the micro-level of courtroom interaction, this study contributes to an understanding of how disputes are built through participants’ discursive practices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm University, 2014. 95 p.
Keyword
Child custody disputes, discursive psychology, conversation analysis, institutional talk, interactional dilemmas, reported speech, reported affect, blame allocations, social accounts, membership categories, gendered categories
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Child and Youth Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-97452 (URN)978-91-7447-825-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2014-02-07, De Geersalen, Geovetenskapens hus, Svante Arrhenius väg 14, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Projects
Vittnesmål i vårdnadstvister - förhandlingar om barnets bästa i domstol och familjerätt
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2010-0335
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 2: Accepted. Paper 3: Accepted.

Available from: 2014-01-16 Created: 2013-12-11 Last updated: 2015-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ingrids, HenrikAronsson, Karin
By organisation
Department of Child and Youth Studies
In the same journal
Research on Language and Social Interaction
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 67 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf