Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bad reporting or Bad Science?  Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM).
(English)Article in journal (Refereed) Accepted
National Category
Other Biological Topics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-97915OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-97915DiVA: diva2:681286
Available from: 2013-12-19 Created: 2013-12-19 Last updated: 2013-12-19

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM)
Other Biological Topics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf