Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The Limitations of International Law Expertise: War Amongst Peacemakers: The Juba Peace Process as Battleground for International Lawyer's Biases (name of panel)
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.ORCID iD: , 0000-0003-0241-3311?lang=en.
2013 (English)In: Europen Society of International Law (ESIL): Conference Paper Series / [ed] Nico Krisch, Mario Prost, Anne van Aaken, Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2013, vol 3. nr 1- p.Conference paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This paper reflects on the limitations of international law expertise, using examples from the Juba peace process on the civil war in Uganda. In peace negotiations (like in all situations), the international law expert must acknowledge the limitations of international law. International law is one-dimensional, and cannot take all relevant factors into account. Further, in any given situation, there will be some regimes and some rules of international law that are more effective than others, because they have powerful support or efficient mechanisms. This means that some norms, some claims and the interests of some stakeholders will be privileged. Many of the controversies associated with international interventions based on international law – like the ICC prosecutions in Uganda – have in fact been caused by too much emphasis on, for instance, international criminal justice and civil rights, and too little emphasis on reparations, economic and social rights and collective rights. Still, even if international law could be better used, there are limits to what can be accomplished even with creative international law expertise. There is a structural bias in international law, which privileges the state. International law, and its institutions, can do too little to refer matters from the government to other legitimate stakeholders, often leaving us with a choice between the (distant) supranational level and the (corrupt) national level. While international law does determine an international minimum standard for the state, it is still much better at empowering the government than at empowering people.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2013. vol 3. nr 1- p.
, ESIL Conference Paper Series, 6/2013
Keyword [en]
transitional justice, professional expertise, Uganda, ICC, Juba, Uganda, international law, legal expertise
National Category
Research subject
Public International Law
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-98002OAI: diva2:682091
5th ESIL Research Forum 'International Law as Profession’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 22 - 24 May 2013
ESIL 2013 5th Research Forum: International Law as a Profession Conference Paper No. 6/2013
Available from: 2013-12-23 Created: 2013-12-23 Last updated: 2014-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Fulltext(458 kB)31 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 458 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wrange, Pål
By organisation
Department of Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 31 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 45 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link