Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dilaogue at the boundaries: Dialogues for teaching and learning
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education. (DidaktikDesign)
2014 (English)In: Dialogue at the boundaries: The Fourth International Interdiciplinary Conference on Perpsectives of Dialogism in Mikhael Bakhtin, Institute for Dialogic Pedagogy, 15-19 January 2014, Waikato Univ, Hamilton NZ / [ed] Jayne White, 2014Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Dialogues are the base of teaching and learning. Although neither Bakhtin nor Voloshinov were concerned with pedagogy, their contributions on dialogue can offer new insights into the problems of teaching and learning. Focus-group conversations over time might be a good illustration of the phenomenon. 

From the theoretical perspectives of Bakhtin and Voloshinov, and their followers (cf Rommetveit, 1979; Holquist, 1990; Wertsch, 1998), the present paper has considered some important notions of dialogism, such as, I, you, self, other, intersubjectivity, alterity, dialogicality, and genre. In addition to these variables the notions of mastery, appropriation and identity have been considered when analyzing focus-group conversations over time.

                Focus group studies on dyslexia involving different professionals have shown that teaching and learning go hand in hand. Initially the conversations about dyslexia showed upon alterity between the participants. The medical professionals, initially, spoke about the pathological apart of dyslexia, using a medical genre, while the teachers, using a pedagogical genre, spoke about the classroom situation of dyslectic children. But over time, intersubjectivity between them became obvious. This also manifested by an increased use of dialogicality, which was shown by responses such as:

Ph: Ah I see understanding each child´s dyslexia in a pedagogical context (…) interesting (…) we just end up diagnosing a lack of ability, let´s hear more (…)

Teach: (…) but I am more aware of the child on the playing and learning premisses(…)

                 

On the way of creating an intersubjectivity situation definition of the topic of dyslexia, the material showed that the different professional groups started to master the others´ apprehension of the topic. Not until the end of the focus group conversations had they appropriated the different professionals’ views on dyslexia.

During this process the I became filled with the voices of the other, creating a self, which also changed the identity of the different professionals. They became professionals of dyslexia, not only from one discipline but from a merging of several disciplines.

A Bakhtinian dialogical approach to focus group conversations opens up for a new methodology of investigation teaching and learning.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014.
Keyword [en]
dialogue competence professional language focus group
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-101594OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-101594DiVA: diva2:704439
Conference
The Fourth International Interdiciplinary Conference on Perpsectives of Dialogism in Mikhael Bakhtin, Institute for Dialogic Pedagogy, Waikato Univ, Hamilton NZ
Available from: 2014-03-12 Created: 2014-03-12 Last updated: 2014-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Abstract(214 kB)19 downloads
File information
File name SUMMARY01.pdfFile size 214 kBChecksum SHA-512
2003e0b3d73e2e059e4e7e418d2b23f4f520709b83392a94c137f51c603e6a1dfd27fde89fef81b92dd87125f92ad515b589be61a42be273807506e50163d0f1
Type summaryMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Conf.website

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Geijer, Lena
By organisation
Department of Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 264 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf