Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. University of Tasmania, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Nature, ISSN 0028-0836, E-ISSN 1476-4687, Vol. 506, no 7487, 216-+ p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In line with global targets agreed under the Convention on Biological Diversity, the number of marine protected areas (MPAs) is increasing rapidly, yet socio-economic benefits generated by MPAs remain difficult to predict and under debate(1,2). MPAs often fail to reach their full potential as a consequence of factors such as illegal harvesting, regulations that legally allow detrimental harvesting, or emigration of animals outside boundaries because of continuous habitat or inadequate size of reserve(3-5). Here we show that the conservation benefits of 87 MPAs investigated worldwide increase exponentially with the accumulation of five key features: no take, well enforced, old (>10 years), large (>100 km(2)), and isolated by deep water or sand. Using effective MPAs with four or five key features as an unfished standard, comparisons of underwater survey data from effective MPAs with predictions based on survey data from fished coasts indicate that total fish biomass has declined about two-thirds from historical baselines as a result of fishing. Effective MPAs also had twice as many large (>250 mm total length) fish species per transect, five times more large fish biomass, and fourteen times more shark biomass than fished areas. Most (59%) of the MPAs studied had only one or two key features and were not ecologically distinguishable from fished sites. Our results show that global conservation targets based on area alone will not optimize protection of marine biodiversity. More emphasis is needed on better MPA design, durable management and compliance to ensure that MPAs achieve their desired conservation value.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 506, no 7487, 216-+ p.
National Category
Ecology Environmental Sciences Sociology
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-101477DOI: 10.1038/nature13022ISI: 000331107700037OAI: diva2:704826


Available from: 2014-03-13 Created: 2014-03-10 Last updated: 2014-09-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kininmonth, Stuart
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
EcologyEnvironmental SciencesSociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 28 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link