Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 80 credits / 120 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Background: Humans are part of social-ecological systems, and preferably these systems are resilient, as this increases security of societal benefits derived from them. However, ecosystem-resilience is often threatened by loss/degradation of natural areas. Ideally, nature is only developed after careful cost/benefit analyses, but non-marketable ecosystem-services are often left unaccounted in land-development plans, resulting in loss of these systems and services. One solution is incorporating ecosystem-services into cost/benefit analyses by putting a price-tag on these services. However, people do not accept the ensuing trade-offs, which pit sacred values (nature) against secular values (money). Such (taboo) trade-offs are morally offensive, yet they are necessary if we want to preserve ecosystems from ongoing degradation. 

Moral cleansing – attempts to reaffirm one’s own moral position - is a reaction towards taboo trade-offs (i.e. in the shape of donations to charities) However, little is known about people’s behavioural response to assaults on sacred values related to the environment. 

Aim: This study focuses on how trade-offs between environmental ‘sacred’ values and monetary values affect expressions of moral cleansing, namely pro-environmental behaviour in the shape of donations to an environmental charity. It investigates whether taboo trade-offs have effects on people’s environmental donations, and consequently the relative importance of trade-offs in such behaviour compared to other behaviour-influencing factors. Laboratory experiments (N=139) were conducted followed by regression analyses, and Multimodel-Inference techniques for data-analysis. 

Conclusion: Participants’ decision-to-donate to an environmental charity is affected by social consciousness and taboo trade-offs. Thus taboos are a factor influencing donation behaviour. 

Discussion: Results suggest that people with a non-anthropocentric worldview believe that they ought to donate more, but in reality, other factors influence the real decision-to-donate. In this study it is exposure to a taboo trade-off and social consciousness that affects the real decision-to-donate. This supports prior evidence for moral cleansing effects and expands it to environmental fields. It also shows the added use of the explorative MMI-approach in social science-topics. Societal applicability is found in improvement of CBAs, and potential usage as behaviour-change technique. However, such usage deserves more attention on practicalities, feasibility and ethics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Keyword [en]
social-ecological systems, trade offs
National Category
Environmental Sciences Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-105529OAI: diva2:728703
Available from: 2014-06-24 Created: 2014-06-24 Last updated: 2014-06-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
Environmental SciencesSocial Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 44 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link