How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?
2014 (English)In: Psychological Research, ISSN 0340-0727, E-ISSN 1430-2772, Vol. 78, no 5, 623-633 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Combining study and test trials during learning is more beneficial for long-term retention than repeated study without testing (i.e., the testing effect). Less is known about the relative efficacy of different response formats during testing. We tested the hypothesis that overt testing (typing responses on a keyboard) during a practice phase benefits later memory more than covert testing (only pressing a button to indicate successful retrieval). In Experiment 1, three groups learned 40 word pairs either by repeatedly studying them, by studying and overtly testing them, or by studying and covertly testing them. In Experiment 2, only the two testing conditions were manipulated in a within-subjects design. In both experiments, participants received cued recall tests after a short (similar to 19 min) and a long (1 week) retention interval. In Experiment 1, all groups performed equally well at the short retention interval. The overt testing group reliably outperformed the repeated study group after 1 week, whereas the covert testing group performed insignificantly different from both these groups. Hence, the testing effect was demonstrated for overt, but failed to show for covert testing. In Experiment 2, overtly tested items were better and more quickly retrieved than those covertly tested. Further, this does not seem to be due to any differences in retrieval effort during learning. To conclude, overt testing was more beneficial for later retention than covert testing, but the effect size was small. Possible explanations are discussed.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 78, no 5, 623-633 p.
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-107615DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0522-8ISI: 000340585000002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-107615DiVA: diva2:750103