Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A dawning demand for a new cannabis policy: A study of Swedish online drug discussions
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD).
2014 (English)In: International journal on drug policy, ISSN 0955-3959, E-ISSN 1873-4758, Vol. 25, no 4, 673-681 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: This study examines how online discussions on drug policy are formulating an oppositional cannabis discourse in an otherwise prohibitionist country like Sweden. The focus of the paper is to identify demands for an alternative cannabis policy as well as analysing how these demands are linked to governance. Methods: The empirical material is 56 discussion-threads from the online message-board Flashback Forum that were active during the first eight months of 2012. Discourse theory was used to locate the discourse, and governmentality theory was used to locate the political belonging of the discourse. Results: On Flashback Forum demands for a new cannabis policy are articulated in opposition to Swedish prohibitionist discourse. The oppositional discourse is constructed around the nodal points cannabis, harm, state and freedom that fill legalisation/decriminalisation/liberalisation with meaning. The nodal points are surrounded by policy demands that get their meaning through the particular nodal. These demands originate from neo-liberal and welfarist political rationalities. Neo-liberal and welfarist demands are mixed, and participants are simultaneously asking for state and individual approaches to handle the cannabis issue. Conclusion: Swedish online discourse on cannabis widens the scope beyond the confines of drug policy to broader demands such as social justice, individual choice and increased welfare. These demands are not essentially linked together and many are politically contradictory. This is also significant for the discourse; it is not hegemonised by a political ideology. The discourse is negotiated between the neo-liberal version of an alternative policy demanding individual freedom, and the welfarist version demanding social responsibility. This implies the influence of the heritage from the social-democratic discourse, centred on state responsibility, which have been dominating Swedish politics in modern times. Consequently, this study refutes that the demand for a new cannabis policy is strictly neo-liberal.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 25, no 4, 673-681 p.
Keyword [en]
Cannabis, Internet, Discourse, Governmentality, Neo-liberal, Welfarist
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108002DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.04.001ISI: 000341482600004OAI: diva2:752908


Available from: 2014-10-06 Created: 2014-10-06 Last updated: 2014-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Månsson, Josefin
By organisation
Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD)
In the same journal
International journal on drug policy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 1438 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link