Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Understanding and Treating Procrastination: a Review of a Common Self-Regulatory Failure
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
2014 (English)In: Psychology, ISSN 2152-7180, E-ISSN 2152-7199, Vol. 5, no 3, 1488-1502 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Procrastination is a pervasive self-regulatory failure affecting approximately one-fifth of the adult population and half of the student population. It is defined as one’s voluntarily delay of an intended course of action despite being worse off as a result of that delay. Procrastination has a negative impact on performance and is associated with poorer mental health. Stress, worry, and feelings of guilt are common among those who procrastinate recurrently. In addition, procrastination is associated with fewer mental health-seeking behaviors and increased treatment delay, leading to greater distress and the exacerbation of illness. The current paper seeks to provide a theoretical and clinical understanding of procrastination by reviewing prior research. Procrastination can be understood using different motivational theories, learning theory, self-efficacy theory, as well as biases and heuristics. Temporal motivational theory is proposed as an integrated explanation for procrastination, consisting of the interaction of four different variables: expectancy, value, impulsiveness, and time, each of which affects the tendency to procrastinate. A general implication is that procrastination should be regarded as an idiosyncratic behavioral problem that requires a cognitive case conceptualization or a functional analysis in order to guide therapists in their work. A number of treatment interventions might be used in relation to procrastination—for example, efficacy performance spirals, automaticity, stimulus control, stimulus cues, learned industriousness, and cognitive restructuring. Furthermore, the current paper explores the evidence on using cognitive behavior therapy for procrastination, discussing the scarcity of randomized controlled trials and the lack of validated outcome measures, and highlighting the need for further research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Irvine: Scientific Research Publishing, 2014. Vol. 5, no 3, 1488-1502 p.
Keyword [en]
procrastination, cognitive behavior therapy, review
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108571DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.513160OAI: diva2:759419
Available from: 2014-10-29 Created: 2014-10-29 Last updated: 2014-11-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rozental, AlexanderCarlbring, Per
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 66 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link