Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
No Oscar for The Oscar?: Behind Hollywood's Walk of Greed
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Media Studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1286-073X
2014 (English)In: Networking Knowledge, ISSN 1755-9944, Vol. 7, no 4, 1-16 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In 1966 the popular interest in the Academy Awards propelled Paramount Pictures to produce The Oscar (Embassy Pictures-Paramount Pictures, 1966), a film based on the homonymous novel by Richard Sale. The Oscar tells the story of an unscrupulous actor willing to do anything in his power to obtain the golden statuette, regardless of whom he has to take down along the way. Building up on fantasies of social mobility, we see the protagonist (Frankie) display his vanity, arrogance and greed to create a less than likeable character whose only hope to put his career back on track lies in obtaining the precious statuette. 

The movie intends to be a sneak peek behind the scenes of the biggest award ceremony, but also behind the lifestyle of the Hollywood elites, their glory and their misery as part of the Hollywood disposal machinery. Despite not being financed or officially supported by the Academy, the film intertwines elements of fiction and reality by using real footage of the event, and featuring several contemporary representatives of the movie industry such as Edith Head, Hedda Hopper, Frank and Nancy Sinatra, playing cameo roles, adding up to the inter-textual capacities of the story. Head’s participation was particularly exploited for the promotion of the film, taking advantage of her position at Paramount, her status as a multiple winner, and her role as a fashion consultant for the Academy Awards. This paper is an analytical account of the film’s production process. Through a close look to its publicity, it will unravel how the studios relied on the awards, and all possible inter-textual capacities to promote the film, despite the Academy’s distancing from the project. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 7, no 4, 1-16 p.
Keyword [en]
epiphenomena, academy awards, the oscar, edith head, fashion, film, hollywood, public relations strategies, marketing, history
National Category
Studies on Film History Media Studies
Research subject
Fashion Studies; Cinema Studies; Media and Communication Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108934OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-108934DiVA: diva2:761534
Available from: 2014-11-07 Created: 2014-11-07 Last updated: 2015-06-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No Oscar for the Oscar?(1067 kB)120 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1067 kBChecksum SHA-512
dae4246ad8290bc09f24d9dc41715b1959c66a5710063a944ada5ca600ae75675267639d12c0d75bc5f309f6d61e463709265fcfcdf6a92f97e4f2be53fc87da
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Free full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Castaldo Lundén, Elizabeth
By organisation
Department of Media Studies
Studies on FilmHistoryMedia Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 120 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 304 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf