Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The G-Word: Virtuosity and Violation, Negotiating and Transforming graffiti
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Art History.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8448-3588
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Contemporary public discussions on graffiti are characterized by co-existence of contradictory claims. On the one hand graffiti is described as vandalism, and on the other as an artistic movement. Michel Foucault’s discourse theory, and the concepts of discursive formation and discursive practice are operationalized in order to frame the object of study, and the contradictory claims regarding graffiti are studied as points of diffraction.

The aim of the study is to investigate the construction of graffiti as a phenomenon dependent on diametrically opposite but also interdependent claims, as well as how and in which contexts these statements are enounced. Graffiti is thus understood as a transnational phenomenon produced by subcultural as well as and institutional agents, and the thesis analyzes visual and textual material produced within both subcultural and institutional situations. The study is conducted on material concerning three different cultural contexts: different descriptions on the development subcultural graffiti in New York City (circa 1972–1987); the framings of the graffiti on the Berlin Wall in English-language newspapers; and the adaptation of New York’s zero tolerance of graffiti in Stockholm, during the 1990s and early 2000s.

The institutions in the studied material represent a wide array of sectors such as the police, art institutions, and public-transit companies, and they interact with graffiti from their own interests and perspectives. The claims of cultural institutions often fall within what in this thesis has been referred to as a consenting discursive practice, built upon the statement ‘graffiti is art’. It is also in relation to this discursive practice that most subcultural descriptions of graffiti are produced. The claims by institutions such as the police and public-transportation companies are almost exclusively found in the interdependent, rejecting discursive practice, built upon the statement ‘graffiti is a crime’.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Årsta: Dokument Press , 2014. , 224 p.
Keyword [en]
Graffiti, Graffiti Art, Street Art, Berlin Wall, Zero Tolerance, Hip-Hop, Art Institutions, Nolltolerans, Art History, Visual Analysis
National Category
Art History
Research subject
Art History
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-109087ISBN: 978-91-85639-68-7OAI: diva2:762545
Public defence
2014-12-05, sal G, Arrheniuslaboratorierna, Svante Arrhenius väg 20 C, Stockholm, 13:00 (Swedish)
Available from: 2014-11-13 Created: 2014-11-11 Last updated: 2014-11-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kimvall, Jacob
By organisation
Department of Art History
Art History

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 883 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link