Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Effects of phylogenetic reconstruction method on the robustness of species delimitation using single-locus data
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences. Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
2014 (English)In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, ISSN 2041-210X, Vol. 5, no 10, 1086-1094 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Coalescent-based species delimitation methods combine population genetic and phylogenetic theory to provide an objective means for delineating evolutionarily significant units of diversity. The generalised mixed Yule coalescent (GMYC) and the Poisson tree process (PTP) are methods that use ultrametric (GMYC or PTP) or non-ultrametric (PTP) gene trees as input, intended for use mostly with single-locus data such as DNA barcodes. Here, we assess how robust the GMYC and PTP are to different phylogenetic reconstruction and branch smoothing methods. We reconstruct over 400 ultrametric trees using up to 30 different combinations of phylogenetic and smoothing methods and perform over 2000 separate species delimitation analyses across 16 empirical data sets. We then assess how variable diversity estimates are, in terms of richness and identity, with respect to species delimitation, phylogenetic and smoothing methods. The PTP method generally generates diversity estimates that are more robust to different phylogenetic methods. The GMYC is more sensitive, but provides consistent estimates for BEAST trees. The lower consistency of GMYC estimates is likely a result of differences among gene trees introduced by the smoothing step. Unresolved nodes (real anomalies or methodological artefacts) affect both GMYC and PTP estimates, but have a greater effect on GMYC estimates. Branch smoothing is a difficult step and perhaps an underappreciated source of bias that may be widespread among studies of diversity and diversification. Nevertheless, careful choice of phylogenetic method does produce equivalent PTP and GMYC diversity estimates. We recommend simultaneous use of the PTP model with any model-based gene tree (e.g. RAxML) and GMYC approaches with BEAST trees for obtaining species hypotheses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 5, no 10, 1086-1094 p.
Keyword [en]
coalescent, DNA barcoding, GMYC, metabarcoding, molecular dating, NGS, OTU, PTP, speciation, species delimitation
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-110207DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12246ISI: 000344598300012OAI: diva2:769849


Available from: 2014-12-09 Created: 2014-12-08 Last updated: 2014-12-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Humphreys, Aelys M.
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 21 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link