Different Institutions within Similar States: the Norwegian and Swedish Sámediggis
2014 (English)In: Ethnopolitics, ISSN 1744-9057, Vol. 14, no 1, 32-51 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
In response to indigenous demands for self-determination, Norway and Sweden both established a Sámediggi (Sámi parliament) consisting of popularly elected Sámi representatives. The political systems of these two countries are generally regarded as similar, but there are considerable differences between the two Sámediggis. Their legal basis, authority and mandate, as well as their electoral system, seem to vary significantly between the countries; maybe even more important, so does their influence and autonomy within their respective political systems. In this article, the two Sámediggis are described and compared. How does their institutional design differ? Why did Norway and Sweden design their parliaments differently? And how have these institutions developed since their establishment?
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London, 2014. Vol. 14, no 1, 32-51 p.
Indigenous rights, Sámi Parliament/Sámediggi, political representation
Research subject Political Science
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-110286DOI: 10.1080/17449057.2014.926611OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-110286DiVA: diva2:770477
ProjectsThe Sámi Parliaments as Representative Bodies: A Comparative Study of the Elections in Sweden and Norway 2013Indigenous Peoples’ Rights to Self-determination: The Institutional Design and Policy Process of the Swedish Sámi Parliament