Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Comparative Study on Syntactic Transfer in L2 and L3 school-aged English learners in Sweden: The acquisition of the English existential expletive subject
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of English.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Various studies have indicated during the past decade that language transfer in L3 may not only stem from L1 but from L2 as well, and that it might sometimes even be stronger from L2, depending on certain factors that facilitate or inhibit transfer. This phenomenon of L2 as the main transfer source in L3 has often been referred to as the ”L2 status factor” (Hammarberg, 2001). The L2 status factor hypothesis expects that the priorly acquired language which scores the highest in several transfer factors will adopt the role of ”external supplier language” (Hammarberg, 2001), i.e. it will be the main source of transfer providing L3 with linguistic features. Namely, the factors that have hitherto been proposed to condition transfer are: typology, psychotypology, proficiency, and psychoaffective factors. The aim of this investigation is to compare the transfer that two groups might exhibit with regard to the English existential expletive pronoun (there), in order to account to whether transfer in L3 might be stronger from L2 than from L1 in this syntactic context. One group consists of subjects with different L1s, L2 Swedish and L3 English; the other is formed by L1 Swedish and L2 English speakers. The informants are aged 13-14, speak the L1s and Swedish (nearly) fluently and English at a basic/intermediate level. Basing the study on the L2 status factor hypothesis, and taking several transfer factors into consideration when analyzing the collected written data, the results are discussed both from a general perspective (from aggregate group scores) and from a micro-perspective (by tracing individual differences). The results obtained suggest that transfer in L3 appears to be stronger from L2 than from L1 when evaluating the aggregate group scores, but only in some cases (and not in most) when examining the individuals separately.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 42 p.
Keyword [en]
transfer, cross-linguistic, expletive, existential, there-construction, L1, L2, L3, L2-status, acquisition, foreign-language, SLA, second language, third language, micro-perspective, external supplier language, typology, psychotypology
Keyword [sv]
transfer, tvärspråkligt, L1, L2, L3, tredjespråksinlärning, andraspråksinlärning, psykotypologi
National Category
Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-113018OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-113018DiVA: diva2:782404
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-01-27 Created: 2015-01-21 Last updated: 2015-01-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(875 kB)218 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 875 kBChecksum SHA-512
ece7ef57fb49f28b8a611e7cc103c44d4c234d4ed64f0c285e237b23d42e877415d0c9ad521069099131c1daf731b1b9eeab05b6105e9b67b08772e6552f82eb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of English
Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 218 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 433 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf