The mediating role of demand and control in the relationship between leadership behaviour and employee distress: a cross-sectional study
2015 (English)In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, ISSN 0020-7489, E-ISSN 1873-491X, Vol. 52, no 2, 543-554 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Background: The relationship between leadership and employee distress is well established, however, the processes involved in this relationship remain largely unclear. For a stretched nursing workforce, understanding in what ways leadership may influence employee distress is particularly important.
Objectives: To examine possible mediating effects of the work environment factors demand and control in the relationship between leadership behaviour in change, production, and employee orientation and employee distress.
Design: Cross-sectional study design.
Settings: The study was conducted at a large county council in Sweden providing both institutional and non-institutional care.
Participants: A random sample of 1249 employees (primarily nurses, but also a wide range of other healthcare professionals and administrative staff), who had a healthcare manager that was about to enter a leadership development programme (n = 171), responded to a web-based questionnaire. The response rate was 62%.
Methods: The employees rated their healthcare managers’ behaviour in change, production, and employee orientation, as well as their own perceptions of level of demand, control (subdivided into decision authority and skill discretion), and five distress outcomes. Multilevel analysis was performed.
Results: The mediators demand, decision authority, and skill discretion were significant predictors of all five distress outcomes for all three leadership orientations. In eight of 15 regressions, the mediators fully explained the relationships between leadership orientations and outcomes. Four of five relationships with distress outcomes were fully mediated for change-oriented leadership, whereas two of five outcomes were fully mediated for production- and employee-oriented leadership. In all three leadership orientations, the relationship between the mediator skill discretion and the distress measure disengagement were particularly strong, with B-coefficients (−.44, p < .001) twice as high as for any of the other relationships.
Conclusions: It seems that the way that employees perceive healthcare managers’ change-oriented behaviour, and how that aspect is related to employee distress, is primarily explained by perception of demand and control. Furthermore, regardless of leadership behaviour orientation, how employees perceive their opportunity to use specific job skills plays an important role in the interplay between perception of healthcare managers’ behaviour and disengagement.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 52, no 2, 543-554 p.
leadership behaviour, employee distress, demand-control, mediation, healthcare
Research subject Psychology
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-114040DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.003ISI: 000348882200006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-114040DiVA: diva2:789119
We wish to express deepest gratitude for the financial support from AFA Försäkring, grant no. 100073, which made this study and analyses possible. We are grateful for invaluable advice from Professor Christer Sandahl, Karolinska Institute, and for support from Mikael Ohrling, CEO at Stockholm County Council (SCC). We would like to thank the participating respondents at SCC for taking their time to answer the questionnaires, and Therese Wahlström, Karolinska Institute, for help with data collection.
Conflict of interest: Dr Bergman was partly financed by the organization where the study “Effects of leadership development in healthcare” took place, for coordination of data collection.
Funding: Funding was provided by AFA Försäkring, grant no 100073. The funder had no involvement in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Ethical approval: Regional Ethical Review Board, reg. no. 2010/979-31/5.2015-02-172015-02-172015-03-18Bibliographically approved