Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Local Difference Measures between Complex Networks for Dynamical System Model Evaluation
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany.
Number of Authors: 4
2015 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 10, no 4, e0118088Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A faithful modeling of real-world dynamical systems necessitates model evaluation. A recent promising methodological approach to this problem has been based on complex networks, which in turn have proven useful for the characterization of dynamical systems. In this context, we introduce three local network difference measures and demonstrate their capabilities in the field of climate modeling, where these measures facilitate a spatially explicit model evaluation. Building on a recent study by Feldhoff et al. [1] we comparatively analyze statistical and dynamical regional climate simulations of the South American monsoon system. Three types of climate networks representing different aspects of rainfall dynamics are constructed from the modeled precipitation space-time series. Specifically, we define simple graphs based on positive as well as negative rank correlations between rainfall anomaly time series at different locations, and such based on spatial synchronizations of extreme rain events. An evaluation against respective networks built from daily satellite data provided by the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 3B42 V7 reveals far greater differences in model performance between network types for a fixed but arbitrary climate model than between climate models for a fixed but arbitrary network type. We identify two sources of uncertainty in this respect. Firstly, climate variability limits fidelity, particularly in the case of the extreme event network; and secondly, larger geographical link lengths render link misplacements more likely, most notably in the case of the anticorrelation network; both contributions are quantified using suitable ensembles of surrogate networks. Our model evaluation approach is applicable to any multidimensional dynamical system and especially our simple graph difference measures are highly versatile as the graphs to be compared may be constructed in whatever way required. Generalizations to directed as well as edge-and node-weighted graphs are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 10, no 4, e0118088
National Category
Other Natural Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-117479DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118088ISI: 000352588500003PubMedID: 25856374OAI: diva2:821410
Available from: 2015-06-15 Created: 2015-05-20 Last updated: 2015-06-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Donges, Jonathan F.
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Other Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle ScholarTotal: 1 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 24 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link