Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Land Type Categories as a Complement to Land Use and Land Cover Attributes in Landscape Mapping and Monitoring
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography. (Landskapsekologi och geomatik)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4845-977X
2015 (English)In: Land Use and Land Cover Semantics: Principles, Best Practices, and Prospects / [ed] Ola Ahlqvist, Dalia Varanka, Steffen Fritz, and Krzysztof Janowicz, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015, 171-190 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of land cover and land use descriptions varies, and this influences how these concepts are perceived in different contexts. The increasing need for spatial data for multipurpose monitoring and modeling also increases the demands for compatibility, repeatability, detail, and well-documented criteria. We suggest that threshold values along a continuous scale can be used to create nominal classes for a common conceptual framework. However, the exact values of these thresholds need to be based on well-defined functional and systematic criteria. Ecological and environmental gradients are often mosaic and complex, and several types of land use may coexist at the same site. In reality, land use can be seen as a “shifting cloud” of activities varying in both time and space. We advocate the use of strict definitions of land cover as physical structures and land use as human activities, which raises the need for a complementary concept, which we call “land type,” with stable threshold values based on mutually exclusive functional criteria. Such functional criteria often put clear limits to what spatial resolution is appropriate, since the suitability for a certain purpose (e.g., agriculture or forestry) is determined by the user of the land, rather than by the independent observer. Our example of land type categories comprises a two-level hierarchical classification with seven main types and altogether 28 subtypes. As an example, we discuss the overlapping Swedish definitions of forest and arable land. The criteria that define our main land types are less dependent on how the area is managed at a specific moment in time, and they are therefore less sensitive to short-term variation. The land types define the limits for what land cover and land use can be expected at a certain site, given, for example, ground conditions, water, or artificial structures. Since such land types need to incorporate functional and qualitative understanding and interpretation, human visual interpretation is needed, whereas automated remote sensing methods are suitable mainly for the structural aspects of land cover.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015. 171-190 p.
Keyword [en]
Land type classification; functional criteria; arable land; forest
National Category
Human Geography Natural Sciences Physical Geography Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
Research subject
Physical Geography
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-119367ISBN: 978-1-4822-3739-9OAI: diva2:844761
Available from: 2015-08-07 Created: 2015-08-07 Last updated: 2015-08-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Skånes, Helle
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography
Human GeographyNatural SciencesPhysical GeographyGeosciences, Multidisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 65 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link