Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Confronting and resolving competing values behind conservation objectives
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 7
2015 (English)In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ISSN 0027-8424, E-ISSN 1091-6490, Vol. 112, no 35, 11132-11137 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Diverse motivations for preserving nature both inspire and hinder its conservation. Optimal conservation strategies may differ radically depending on the objective. For example, creating nature reserves may prevent extinctions through protecting severely threatened species, whereas incentivizing farmland hedgerows may benefit people through bolstering pest-eating or pollinating species. Win-win interventions that satisfy multiple objectives are alluring, but can also be elusive. To achieve better outcomes, we developed and implemented a practical typology of nature conservation framed around seven common conservation objectives. Using an intensively studied bird assemblage in southern Costa Rica as a case study, we applied the typology in the context of biodiversity's most pervasive threat: habitat conversion. We found that rural habitats in a varied tropical landscape, comprising small farms, villages, forest fragments, and forest reserves, provided biodiversity-driven processes that benefit people, such as pollination, seed dispersal, and pest consumption. However, species valued for their rarity, endemism, and evolutionary distinctness declined in farmland. Conserving tropical forest on farmland increased species that international tourists value, but not species discussed in Costa Rican newspapers. Despite these observed trade-offs, our analyses also revealed promising synergies. For example, we found that maintaining forest cover surrounding farms in our study region would likely enhance most conservation objectives at minimal expense to others. Overall, our typology provides a framework for resolving the competing objectives of modern conservation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 112, no 35, 11132-11137 p.
Keyword [en]
agriculture, bird, conservation, ecosystem services, multifunctionality
National Category
Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use Biological Systematics Ecology
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-121496DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504788112ISI: 000360383200080OAI: diva2:860581
Available from: 2015-10-13 Created: 2015-10-05 Last updated: 2015-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Daily, Gretchen C.
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-useBiological SystematicsEcology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 23 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link