A sociological perspective on emotions in the judiciary
2016 (English)In: Emotion Review, ISSN 1754-0739, E-ISSN 1754-0747, Vol. 8, no 1, 32-37 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Introducing a sociological perspective on judicial emotions, we argue that previous studies underemphasize structural andinteractional dimensions. Through key concepts in the sociology of emotions we relate professional court actors’ emotionmanagement to the emotional regime of the judiciary. Examples from the Swedish judiciary illustrate three main arguments:(a) The idea of rational justice as nonemotional must be investigated as a joint accomplishment including collective emotionmanagement; (b) Judicial objectivity requires situated emotion management and empathy, orientated by emotions of pride/shame;(c) The structural dimensions of power/status mitigate feeling and display rules. The situated power of the judge is upheld byritual deference from other court professionals. Concluding, we suggest topics to develop structural and interactional perspectiveson judicial emotion.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 8, no 1, 32-37 p.
court, emotion, judges, power, status
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-122393DOI: 10.1177/1754073915601226ISI: 000367730900006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-122393DiVA: diva2:865933
ProjectsEmotions in court
FunderSwedish Research Council, 2011-1553