Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Small places, big stakes: ‘meetings’ as moments of ethnographic momentum
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
2015 (English)Conference paper, Presentation (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The Davos summit is surrounded by air of seriousness and hype, but it is also something like a huge cocktail party. The Davos meeting is, in essence, a kind of human beehive, attracting and organizing a multitude of actors around its core, each contributing to the existence of the beehive community, and each disseminating its ideas and perspectives to the world at large. The WEF is essentially a social world of meetings – staged, circumvented, formal, organized meetings – and meetings to which access is tightly restricted. The annual Davos meeting, which is the showcase meeting of the WEF, is also a microcosm of the organization, set up in a small place and speaking to bigger issues: market regulations, financial crises, environmental risks, armed conflicts, and the like. The kinds of questions that arise out offieldwork in organizations such as this, but also more broadly, are to do with access, representation, validity, and the predicaments of doing ethnography in organized settings.

At a more general level, ethnographic fieldwork in organizations – such as corporations, state agencies, and international organizations – often entails that the ethnographer has to rely on meetings as the primary point of access. Oftentimes, this involves doing fieldwork in workshops, at ceremonies, and at other staged, formal events. In addition, such fieldwork tends to be multilocal, mobile, and discontinuous. It may not provide as much of a flavour of the different local sites and a sense of ‘being there’ as one would wish for. The tendency in anthropology to favour the informal, the ‘genuine’ or ‘authentic’ as well as the spontaneous, may leave one with a lingering feeling of having to make do with second- rate material, i.e. the formal, the superficial, and the organized. Fieldwork in meetings, and in meetings to which one may not get full access, may, from that angle, be problematic.

What, if anything, can we learn from doing ethnography in such a small, temporary meeting place, where we don not even have access to much of what goes on?

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
Keyword [en]
meeting, ethnography, access, seclusion, world economic forum
National Category
Sociology
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-123892OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-123892DiVA: diva2:878194
Conference
Meeting Ethnography, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 8-10 oktober 2015
Projects
Att tjäna världen: World Economic Forum som en global politisk aktör
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2015-12-08 Created: 2015-12-08 Last updated: 2016-02-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sörbom, AdrienneGarsten, Christina
By organisation
Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE)
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 25 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link