Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Association between drug-specific indicators of prescribing quality and quality of drug treatment: a validation study
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Aging Research Center (ARC), (together with KI).
Number of Authors: 3
2015 (English)In: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, ISSN 1053-8569, E-ISSN 1099-1557, Vol. 24, no 9, 906-914 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To evaluate the concurrent validity of three European sets of drug-specific indicators of prescribing quality.

Methods: In 200 hip fracture patients (65years), consecutively recruited to a randomized controlled study in Sahlgrenska University Hospital in 2009, quality of drug treatment at study entry was assessed according to a gold standard as well as to three drug-specific indicator sets (Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, French consensus panel list, and German PRISCUS list). As gold standard, two specialist physicians independently assessed and then agreed on the quality for each patient, after initial screening with STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment).

Results: According to the Swedish, French, and German indicator sets, 82 (41%), 54 (27%), and 43 (22%) patients had potentially inappropriate drug treatment. A total of 141 (71%) patients had suboptimal drug treatment according to the gold standard. The sensitivity for the indicator sets was 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.43; 0.59), 0.33 (0.26; 0.41), and 0.29 (0.22; 0.37), respectively. The specificity was 0.83 (0.72; 0.91), 0.88 (0.77; 0.94), and 0.97 (0.88; 0.99). Suboptimal drug treatment was 2.0 (0.8; 5.3), 1.9 (0.7; 5.1), and 6.1 (1.3; 28.6) times as common in patients with potentially inappropriate drug treatment according to the indicator sets, after adjustments for age, sex, cognition, residence, multi-dose drug dispensing, and number of drugs.

Conclusions: In this setting, the indicator sets had high specificity and low sensitivity. This needs to be considered upon use and interpretation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 24, no 9, 906-914 p.
Keyword [en]
drug therapy, health care quality assessment, indicator, validity, pharmacoepidemiology
National Category
Social and Clinical Pharmacy
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-121677DOI: 10.1002/pds.3827ISI: 000360764300002OAI: diva2:889946
Available from: 2015-12-29 Created: 2015-10-13 Last updated: 2015-12-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Aging Research Center (ARC), (together with KI)
In the same journal
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Social and Clinical Pharmacy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 9 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link