Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Compositionality Solves Carnap's Problem
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
2016 (English)In: Erkenntnis, ISSN 0165-0106, E-ISSN 1572-8420, Vol. 87, 721-739 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The standard relation of logical consequence allows for non-standard interpretations of logical constants, as was shown early on by Carnap. But then how can we learn the interpretations of logical constants, if not from the rules which govern their use? Answers in the literature have mostly consisted in devising clever rule formats going beyond the familiar what follows from what. A more conservative answer is possible. We may be able to learn the correct interpretations from the standard rules, because the space of possible interpretations is a priori restricted by universal semantic principles. We show that this is indeed the case. The principles are familiar from modern formal semantics: compositionality, supplemented, for quantifiers, with topic-neutrality.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 87, 721-739 p.
Keyword [en]
Carnap's problem, compositionality, logical constant, logical consequence
National Category
Research subject
Theoretical Philosophy; Mathematical Logic
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-125500DOI: 10.1007/s10670-015-9764-8OAI: diva2:893568
Available from: 2016-01-12 Created: 2016-01-12 Last updated: 2016-08-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westerståhl, Dag
By organisation
Department of Philosophy
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 61 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link