Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Reproductive morphology in the Gnetum cuspidatum group (Gnetales) and its implications for pollination biology in the Gnetales
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences.
Number of Authors: 2
2015 (English)In: Plant Ecology and Evolution, ISSN 2032-3913, E-ISSN 2032-3921, Vol. 148, no 3, 387-396 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and aims - The Gnetales include the extant genera Gnetum, Ephedra and Welwitschia. They are usually functionally dioecious, but male cones often have sterile (but pollination drop-producing) ovules in addition to male units. There are, however, exceptions, i.e. most species of Ephedra and African species of Gnetum. Furthermore, the literature contains conflicting information on the Asian Gnetum cuspidatum. One study states that sterile ovules are present in this species; another that they are absent. The latter also claims that male cones secrete nectar instead, which is interesting because nectar has only been suggested to be present in four gymnosperm species. Here we aim to elucidate whether or not sterile ovules are present in male cones of G. cuspidatum and related taxa, evaluate evidence for nectar being present in gymnosperms and discuss implications for pollination biology. Methods - Male cones from relevant taxa were examined using a dissecting microscope and scanning electron microscopy. Key results - Sterile ovules are present in G. cuspidatum and the related G. macrostachyum, G. microcarpum, G. diminutum and G. loerzingii, but they are minute, hidden among hairs, and easily overlooked. No indications of nectar or nectaries were found and their presence in Asian species of Gnetum is questioned. Conclusions - Insect pollination is probably ancestral in the Gnetales. Like most species of Gnetum, members of the G. cuspidatum group have sterile ovules in male cones, and they can thus attract pollinators to both male and female plants using sweet pollination drops. Although it is possible that these species, in addition, produce extraovular reward for pollinators, we find no such evidence. Instead, it seems plausible that pollination drops have been mistaken for (extraovular) nectar. However, African species of Gnetum have unisexual male cones. Have they developed another means of pollinator reward in male plants or are they wind-pollinated as are their ephedran analogues?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 148, no 3, 387-396 p.
Keyword [en]
Gymnosperms, entomophily, evolution, nectar, pollination drops, taxonomy
National Category
Biological Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-125483DOI: 10.5091/plecevo.2015.1142ISI: 000366150800009OAI: diva2:894510
Available from: 2016-01-15 Created: 2016-01-12 Last updated: 2016-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rydin, Catarina
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Plant Ecology and Evolution
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 10 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link