Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Purposes and degrees of commodification: Economic instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services need not rely on markets or monetary valuation
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 6
2015 (English)In: Ecosystem Services, ISSN 2212-0416, E-ISSN 2212-0416, Vol. 16, 74-82 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Commodification of nature refers to the expansion of market trade to previously non-marketed spheres. This is a contested issue both in the scientific literature and in policy deliberations. The aim of this paper is to analytically clarify and distinguish between different purposes and degrees of commodification and to focus attention to the safeguards: the detailed institutional design. We identify six degrees of commodification and find that all ecosystem services policies are associated with some degree of commodification but only the two highest degrees can properly be associated with neoliberalisation of nature. For example, most payments for ecosystem services (PES) are subsidy-like government compensations not based on monetary valuation of nature. Biodiversity offsets can be designed as market schemes or non-market regulations; the cost-effectiveness of markets cannot be assumed. To avoid the confusion around the concept 'market-based instrument' we suggest replacing it with 'economic instruments' since relying on the price signal is not the same thing as relying on the market. We provide a comprehensive framework emphasising the diversity in institutional design, valuation approaches and role of markets. This provides flexibility and options for policy integration of biodiversity and ecosystem services in different countries according to their political and cultural context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 16, 74-82 p.
Keyword [en]
Biodiversity financing mechanisms, Innovative financial mechanisms, Financialization, Non-monetary valuation, Adaptive governance
National Category
Biological Sciences Earth and Related Environmental Sciences Social and Economic Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-125793DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.012ISI: 000366578000007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-125793DiVA: diva2:896940
Available from: 2016-01-22 Created: 2016-01-18 Last updated: 2016-01-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hahn, ThomasItuarte-Lima, ClaudiaSchultz, MariaTuvendal, Magnus
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Ecosystem Services
Biological SciencesEarth and Related Environmental SciencesSocial and Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 15 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link