Keeping it clean: graffiti, urban space and the exploitation of a moral panic
2015 (English)In: Youth Culture & Subculture, 2015, 132- p.Conference paper, Abstract (Other academic)
Whereas subcultures such as punk, metal, hip-hop, skate, goth and emo have all been the target of moral panics in the past, the conditions that sparked these moral panics have since become banal and normalized, in line with Cohen’s (1972) claim that moral panics per definition tend to be short-lived. The moral panic about subcultural graffiti in Sweden, however, has proved remarkably consistent. Three decades after its emergence in Scandinavia politicians, news editors, transit company representatives, and police officers still point to the immediate danger of graffiti writing, directly linking it to other established folk devils such as drug users, hell-bent vandals, gangs, and professional criminals (Kimvall 2012). Whereas the previous subcultural research has at length discussed the commercial exploitation of the subcultural, the authors point to the increasing commercial exploitation of the moral panic around graffiti, what Lemert (1952) called “deviance exploitation”, as the foundation for the endurance of the moral panic. Drawing from an extensive and ongoing research on governmental attempts to combat illegal graffiti in Sweden, this paper deals with graffiti as mal placé both in relation to urban space and to romanticized conceptions of youth resistance, rendering it not only a suitable enemy for moral entrepreneurs but also a steady cash cow for surveillance firms and graffiti removal firms.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. 132- p.
subcultural theory, subculture, moral panic, graffiti, social theory, hip hop, commodification
Research subject Art History
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-126548OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-126548DiVA: diva2:901083
Contemporary Youth Contemporary Risk. Book of abstracts, Journal of Youth Studies Conference Copenhagen 30 March - 1 April, 2015