Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Managing paradoxes in governance: tensions in the emergence of a new board
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Business School, Accounting.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Business School, Accounting.
2015 (English)In: Contingency, behavioural and evolutionary perspectives on public and nonprofit governance / [ed] Luca Gnan, Alessandro Hinna, Fabio Monteduro, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015, 1-30 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Taking a micro-perspective of governance that includes pro- blem-solving and stakeholder involvement capabilities as part of the stra- tegic steering role, we wish to contribute to the understanding of the human side of governance. Thus we have studied the relationships between the board and its management and stakeholders, and in so doing we recognize internal and external actors as well as the board itself, and how they all contribute to the implementation of the governance function.

Methodology/approach: Based on an interpretative approach that focuses on change over time, we performed a qualitative empirical study of the governance of Robotdalen, a small non-profit public organization in Sweden that is a joint public and private collaboration. This chapter forms part of a longitudinal study that has been carried out since 2009. It is based primarily on interviews with board members, management and other stakeholders, and complemented by document studies and observations.

Findings: Governance practice entails multiple and multilevel tasks, and the tensions between representativeness/professional boards, confor- mance/performance, and controlling/partnering up with management, are prevalent in both small non-profit and public organizations. According to our results the apparent choice between the extremes of each tension is, however, not a choice at all but rather a balancing act. In trying to balance tensions through collaboration between managers, board, financiers, and the hosting university, new governance structures and practices emerge at the organizational level.

Originality/value: By following the process of the emergence of a new board, we illustrate how various actors work together to co-produce gov- ernance functions in practice. In the past little or no effort has been made to take into account contextual factors such as organizational size an aspect that may influence or shape board characteristics and work methodology. We therefore attempt to do so in our chapter, by studying the emergence of a new board in a small public organization, what possible paradoxes and tensions are involved in such work, and how such tensions are managed. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015. 1-30 p.
, Studies in public and non-profit governance, ISSN 2051-6630 ; 4
Keyword [en]
non-profit and public governance, board work, paradoxes, tensions, cooperation
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Administration
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-127457DOI: 10.1108/S2051-663020150000004001OAI: diva2:909240
Available from: 2016-03-04 Created: 2016-03-04 Last updated: 2016-03-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmgren Caicedo, MikaelMårtensson, Maria
By organisation
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 31 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link