The Repugnant Conclusion
2016 (English)In: The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy / [ed] Edward N. Zalta, Stanford: Stanford University , 2016, Revised versionChapter in book (Refereed)
In Derek Parfit's original formulation the Repugnant Conclusion is characterized as follows: “For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better even though its members have lives that are barely worth living” (Parfit 1984). The Repugnant Conclusion highlights a problem in an area of ethics which has become known as population ethics. The last three decades have witnessed an increasing philosophical interest in questions such as “Is it possible to make the world a better place by creating additional happy people?” and “Is there a moral obligation to have children?” The main problem has been to find an adequate theory about the moral value of states of affairs where the number of people, the quality of their lives, and their identities may vary. Since, arguably, any reasonable moral theory has to take these aspects of possible states of affairs into account when determining the normative status of actions, the study of population ethics is of general import for moral theory. As the name indicates, Parfit finds the Repugnant Conclusion unacceptable and many philosophers agree. However, it has been surprisingly difficult to find a theory that avoids the Repugnant Conclusion without implying other equally counterintuitive conclusions. Thus, the question as to how the Repugnant Conclusion should be dealt with and, more generally, what it shows about the nature of ethics has turned the conclusion into one of the cardinal challenges of modern ethics.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stanford: Stanford University , 2016, Revised version.
, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 1095-5054
population ethics, the repugnant conclusion, impossibility theorems, population paradoxes
Research subject Practical Philosophy
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-127240OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-127240DiVA: diva2:912096
FunderSwedish Research Council