Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
2016 (English)In: Science, ISSN 0036-8075, E-ISSN 1095-9203, Vol. 351, no 6277, 1037Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 351, no 6277, 1037
Medical and Health Sciences
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-127996DOI: 10.1126/science.aad9163PubMedID: 26941312Local ID: P-3328OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-127996DiVA: diva2:912103
Category "Technical Comments".2016-03-152016-03-152016-03-30Bibliographically approved