Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Science, ISSN 0036-8075, E-ISSN 1095-9203, Vol. 351, no 6277, 1037Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 351, no 6277, 1037
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-127996DOI: 10.1126/science.aad9163PubMedID: 26941312Local ID: P-3328OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-127996DiVA: diva2:912103
Note

Category "Technical Comments".

Available from: 2016-03-15 Created: 2016-03-15 Last updated: 2016-03-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Stress Research Institute
In the same journal
Science
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 30 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link