Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the Redundancy of Jus ad Vim: A Response to Daniel Brunstetter and Megan Braun
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
Number of Authors: 1
2016 (English)In: Ethics and International Affairs, ISSN 0892-6794, E-ISSN 1747-7093, Vol. 30, no 1, 117-129 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 30, no 1, 117-129 p.
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-129704DOI: 10.1017/S0892679415000659ISI: 000372875900011OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-129704DiVA: diva2:923668
Available from: 2016-04-27 Created: 2016-04-27 Last updated: 2016-04-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Frowe, Helen
By organisation
Department of Philosophy
In the same journal
Ethics and International Affairs
Philosophy, Ethics and ReligionPolitical Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf